[Excerpted from Managing with Measures: How to Use Performance Measurement to Manage for Results and Document Success by Robert I. Wise, forthcoming]
© 2009, SystemWise Consulting, LLC
Comments on the following are welcome by e-mail to mail@managingwithmeasures.com
Measuring is the process of assigning a value from a scale to an attribute of an observed object or event according to an operational definition. The value assigned can be a numerical quantity representing an amount or a label representing a category, or a rating representing a judgment.
A measurement scale defines the range of possible values that can be assigned to the attribute that is observed. When measuring organizational performance, there are three types of scales that are useful—quantitative, categorical, and rating.
An operational definition specifies how a numerical quantity, category label, or rating is to be assigned to an observed object or event. An operational definition includes an explanation of key terms, a description of what, when, and how data are to be collected, and any arithmetic computation involved.
By its technical definition, a measurement process can produce two types of data. It can produce quantitative data whose values can be summarized with means and standard deviations, or it can produce categorical data whose values can be summarized with proportions and percentages.
Qualitative data are data are not produced by the process of measurement as technically defined. Qualitative data are not quantities, labels, or ratings. Qualitative data are commonly in the form of words recorded from observational logs, interviews, or written responses to questions.
Data are subjective if they represent human judgment or opinion. It is possible to use empirical, objective methods to collect subjective data. Thus, whether a particular set of data is objective or subjective depends on what is being measured, not how it is measured.